same_difference: (Default)
[personal profile] same_difference
I emailed this to the mailing list today, and got generally agreement back, so I'll post it here for wider perusal. You should be able to tell what I'm talking about:

[absolutely biased prejudice based cynism] To be honest I haven't been impressed by or particularly enjoyed any of the films. They're far too hackneyed and cliched, nor do they contain anything particularly original or inventive. Though I do admire the author's careful developed money spinning tool. I always get the feeling (based on what I've heard /seen etc) she wrote the stories (not that I've read any of them) by making a list of all the aspects that make certain books really popular and wove them into story that she then aimed at an audience that doesn't require her to actually be a particularly good writer but does have the largest market for royalty making merchandising. [absolutely biased prejudice based cynism ends]

And a calculation of film quality:

Book length increases exponentially across series + unchanging film length + guaranteed box office sales = films that get progressively worse, and cover exponentially less of the story
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

same_difference: (Default)
same_difference

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 06:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios